RECALLING THE CINCINNATI HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION - WE NEED IT MORE THAN EVER!
Click on Photo for more photonews
THIS IS A 2007 PHOTO
RECALLING THE CINCINNATI HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION - WE NEED IT MORE THAN EVER!
Click on Photo for more photonews
THIS IS A 2007 PHOTO
To view
"Faces
of
Turkey"
click
here.
Jesus said “Let the little children come to me, and do not stop them; for it
is to such as these that the kingdom of heaven belongs.”  Matthew 19:14
The Holy Eucharist at Christ Church Cathedral in the City of Cincinnati
To view
"Hagia
Sophia"
click
here.
                                           WE MUST RESTORE RESPECT FOR AND CONFIDENCE IN OUR COURTS

At this juncture of our Nation’s history, perhaps the most urgent and largely overlooked need is the need to restore respect for
and confidence in our judiciary.   Our courts, that third branch of our government, are vital to the proper functioning of a
checked and balanced democracy. During the last four years, respect for the courts have been eroded from many sides.

The most blatant and latest example is the recent refusal to accept the findings of many courts at all levels of a fair presidential
election, one that is free of major voting irregularity.  By a recent count 62 lawsuits had been filed in various state and federal
courts alleging a “rigged” or “stolen” election, but  the judges in 61 of the cases have found the voting to be fair and reliable.  
Only one court in Pennsylvania ordered the recheck of voter IDs to cure any alleged defects.  Yet the messaging of a rigged and
stolen election continued after the courts have upheld the integrity of the election process based on the evidence presented.  
This deliberate refusal to respect the impartial and apolitical judgment of the courts directly led to the attack on the United States
Congress, our first branch of government, resulting in destruction of property and loss of life.

Since the days of partisan driven dispute between William Marbury and James Madison, the courts have labored to protect our
democracy and enhance our liberties by resolving disputes at all levels using the rule of law and application of reason.  The
fundamental benefit is that major arguments and dangerous disagreements are settled without final recourse to armed force.  

Our system of constitutional government entrusts the judiciary to stay above the political pushing and shoving to render
judgments that transcend the political divide.  Indeed, the judiciary is the last recourse for persons without political power.  While
judgments sometimes are imperfect, and inevitably not all parties can be satisfied, our social contract advises us to accept a
judge’s decision and we must remind ourselves that this the why we went to the court in the first place.  

In a nation that is founded on rugged individualism and reasoned revolution, there will be occasions when we are bedeviled by
thoughts of taking the law from the courts and into our own hands.  The consequences are always dire, tragic and regrettable.   
In the final analysis, it falls upon each and everyone of us to maintain confidence in and respect for our judges and Justices of
the third branch of our constitutional government.

Respectfully submitted.

Charleston C. K. Wang,   Updated January 25, 2021.  
To view
"Istanbul"
click
here.

Bill Bell and Charleston C. K. Wang
Trihealth Pavilion  2015
SWIM THE COAST T-Shirt
Awarded Distance Swim
THIRTY FIVE (35) MILES
March 2015
INTERETHNIC COUNCIL OF GREATER CINCINNATI, INC.
HAS A NEW HOMEPAGE AT
www.interethnic.net
Click on Photo to Visit
To read "The
Road to
Emmaus,"  
click
here.
To read "Yad
Vashem, A
Monument &
Name to
Remember"  click

here
.
To read
"Confession of a
Gentile in
Jerusalem:  The
Paradox of the Five
Sheklim Blessing,"  
click
here.
CHARLESTON C. K. WANG
NAZLY MAMEDOVA
WANGLAW
CHARLESTON C. K. WANG
NAZLY MAMEDOVA
WANGLA
W
CHARLESTON C. K. WANG
NAZLY MAMEDOVA
WANGLAW
I largely agree with your assessment.  The U. S. mis-read the world situation in China, Vietnam, Iraq, Granada, Afghanistan, and many other examples.  Our inability to see other than
"good guys and bad guys" has cost us trillions of dollars and untold lives spent doing nothing but fighting wars that have led to, arguably, nothing constructive.  Soft power may have
been our most important "weapon" against forces that seek to destroy democracy, but we don't seem to generally employ them well.  The Marshall Plan and the idea of constructive
engagement would seem to be a preferential response to the many global situations we find ourselves in where we attempt to define  "good guys and bad guys".  A more nuanced
and discerning foreign policy might result in a more thoughtful and constructive way to approach global peace.  At least this is my humble opinion.  

JT.  
John T. Spence, PhD, AICP, Professor, Political Science, Thomas More University.  Thanks for sharing.   September 4, 2021.
Caveat:  This Response is the viewpoint of the reader only and does not reflect that of Thomas More University on any issue discussed.  
Charleston C K Wang Speedo
Violence and war do not show strength of a nation, still less engenders respect and/or earn hearts and mind with people.  If that is the case, why do USA repeatedly use violence and
war as a foreign service tool, with little consideration of the pain and suffering, destruction and killing in other countries and people!?
KC Wong,, Ph.D, J.D.  Professor Emeritus, Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio, September 7, 2021.
Charleston C K Wang Speedo
Working the Tan Lines
on the bank of the Dead Sea
the Lowest Body of Water on Earth
more than 1300 feet below Sea Level
April 2010.
Somewhere near lie biblical Sodom & Gomorrah.
Author's Post Script:  I would like to defer to Sun Tzu once again.  Over 2500 years ago, the ancient Master in the Art of War 孫子兵法 once said:
Chapter 2 - What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged fighting.  There is no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare.  故兵貴勝,不貴久。兵久而國利者,未之有也。
Chapter 3 -  For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the pinnacle of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the pinnacle of skill. 是故百戰百勝,非善之善者
也;不戰而屈人之兵,善之善者也.  C K September 11, 2021.
Working the Tan Lines by the
Aegean of the Mediterranen
Beyond in the mist rises
fabled Patmos, May 2012

In 1949, the United States of America was compelled to withdraw from China Ambassador John Leighton Stuart, a man TIME magazine
had called "perhaps the most respected American in China.”  Mao Zedong (then referred to as Mao Tse-tung) had completed the
armed takeover of that vast country and the USA was in no mood to continue diplomatic relations with the Chinese communists.  Back
home in Washington, D.C. the hue and cry of “WHO LOST CHINA?” soon increased to hurricane force.  Senator Joe McCarhy presided
over a terror against the U. S. State Department and other officials suspected of being soft on communism.  McCarthyism finally spent
itself after that Senator began to look for scapegoats inside the U. S. Army.  General Dwight Eisenhower, now the first Republican
president in 20 years, publicly criticized the Senator’s over-reach in his soft-spoken yet powerful style.

In retrospect, that question “WHO LOST CHINA?” lingers.  In my opinion, Mao won China because the USA backed the regime of Chiang
Kai-shek, who took massive amounts of U. S. dollars and created phantom armies which either did not exist or turned themselves and
their equipment at the critical moment to the Eighth Route Army.  It was not until 1979 when Leonard Woodcock presented diplomatic
credentials as ambassador once again to the People’s Republic of China.

In 1975, disaster struck in Saigon, South Vietnam, when North Vietnamese regulars drove their Russian vintage tanks into the
presidential palace and U. S. Ambassador Graham Anderson Martin was obliged to vacate in haste.   In the aftermath of that
humiliating debacle, the hue and cry over “WHO LOST VIETNAM?” was a weak
doppelgänger to the storm raised by McCarthy.   
A state of diplomatic void existed until 1997 when Pete Petersen returned to Hanoi, Socialist Republic of Vietnam as U. S.
Ambassador.   To this day, the question of “WHO LOST VIETNAM?” lingers.  My simplistic opinion is that South Vietnam was overrun
by the North because after the withdrawal of U. S. troops in 1973, the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (shortened to ARVN) had
become,
from internal corruption, another phantom force .  Soon enough, that army threw down their rifles, doffed their uniforms,
and turned over the heavier equipment to their adversaries.
Oil Painting by Elizabeth Thompson, Lady Butler,
"REMNANTS OF AN ARMY"
showing Assistant British Army Surgeon William
Brydon arriving at Jellalabad after surviving the
disastrous retreat from Kabul in 1842.

Very good argument. Let’s go even further. Why has US been in the state of perpetual war? Because, I think, it has the power and money to spend with whatever excuse it can come up
with such as anticommunism or antiterrorism. Who makes money over the dead bodies of soldiers and civilians? War industry. They made billions at tax payers’ money and soldiers’
lives and limbs. If peace prevails, they can’t pay good money and dividends to their executives and stockholders.. What a sad economy and we call it patriotism.  Anonymous.  9/3/2021.
Charge of Light Brigade-Lord Alfred Tennyson
Last of Light Brigade-Rudyard Kipling
Recessional (Victorian Ode)-Rudyard Kipling
CLICK ON PHOTO  TO
LISTEN TO  RECITATION
INFOCUS:
UNIVERSAL
EDUCATION
IN THE
WORLD -
Example of
Malala
Yousafzai
Click on Photo

Bill Bell and Charleston C. K. Wang
Four Elders from Uzbekistan in their many colored coats
Photocredit:  Boris Yusupov

Robert Harris & Charleston C. K. Wang
BE THE CHANGE:
CIVIL RIGHTS &
IMMIGRATION REFORM
IN 2013

Bill Bell and Charleston C. K. Wang
INFOCUS:
CHEMICAL
WEAPONS & THE
HUMANITARIAN CRISIS
IN SYRIA
Click on Photo
PLEASE CLIICK ON PHOTO TO SEE
COMPLETE PHOTONEWS SPECIAL
ON "THE FACES OF TURKEY."
To view
"Istanbul"
click
here.
To read
"Hezekiah's
Tunnel
under the
City of David,"
click
here.
To view
"The Church
of St. Peter
in Gallicantu"
click
here.
To read
"A Reflection
of Jerusalem
and the New
Jerusalem
from the Ground,"  
click
here.
To view
"Into  the
Heat of
the Hebron
Cauldon,"
\click
here.
To view
"In The
Upper
Room"
click \
here.
To view "The
Garden of
Gethsemane and
Church of All
Nations," click

here.


TO RETURN TO FIRST PAGE NEWS, CLICK HERE

CLICK TO GO TO
>PAGE 1>  >PAGE 2>   >PAGE 3> >PAGE 4>  >PAGE 5> >PAGE 6>  
>PAGE 7> >PAGE 8>  >PAGE 9> >PAGE10> >PAGE11>
>PAGE 12> >PAGE 13>  >PAGE 14> >PAGE 15> >PAGE 16>

Photocredit for this page:  Charleston C. K. Wang
To view
"Pilgrimage to
Bethlehem,
Birthplace
of Jesus,
click
here.
To view
"Wrath
of
Paul,"
click
here.
To view
"Herodion:
A Fortress
During the
Gospels,"
click
here.
To read"The
Wilderness
of Abraham,
Jesus &
Israel-
Palestine,"
click
here.
THE WRATH OF PAUL
Click here or on photo to see WANGNEWS Special
To view "In
Search of the
Messianic
Secret -
Caesarea
Phillipi,"
click
here.
To view
"Sufis
Rumi
Konya,"
click
here.
To view
"The Holy
Isle of
Patmos"
click
here.
To read "Jury
for Jericho,"  
click
here.
EPHESUS OF ST. PAUL & ST. JOHN
Click here or on photo to see WANGNEWS Special
To view
"The
Empty
Tombs,"
click
here.
THE HOLY ISLE OF PATMOS
Click here or on photo to see WANGNEWS Special
To view
"The
Empty
Tombs,"
click
here.
To read "Jury
for Jericho,"  
click
here.
To view "Two
Very Different
Houses" click

here.
To read
"Descending
to the Dead Sea
and Ascending
to Qumran,"  
click
here.
To view
"The Holy
Isle of
Patmos"
click
here.
To read"The
Wilderness
of Abraham,
Jesus &
Israel-
Palestine,"
click
here.
To view
"Sufis
Rumi
Konya,"
click
here.
THE WRATH OF PAUL
Click here or on photo to see WANGNEWS Special
To view
"Herodion:
A Fortress
During the
Gospels,"
click
here.
To view
"Wrath
of
Paul,"
click
here.
From Left to Right - Charleston C. K. Wang, Esq.,  Visiting
Professor Mary Ellen O'Connell (1998-1999) & Dean Gordon A.
Christenson, Emeritus University of Cincinnati College of Law
To view
"Medita-
ting Medi-
terra-nean,"
click
here.
To view
"Caesarea
Maritima as
Known to
Saint Paul,"
click
here.
To view
"The Call for
Simon Peter,
Fisherman,"
click
here.
To view
"Into  the
Heat of
the Hebron
Cauldon,"
\click
here.
To read
"A Reflection
of Jerusalem
and the New
Jerusalem
from the Ground,"  
click
here.

To read
"In Search
of Lazarus,"
click
here.
To view
"In The
Upper
Room"
click \
here.
To view
"The Church
of St. Peter
in Gallicantu"
click
here.
To view
"Visitng the
Dome of the
Rock"
click
here.
To view
Group
photos of
Cincinnati
Pilgrims in
Jerusalem
click
here.
CHARLESTON C. K. WANG
NAZLY MAMEDOVA
WANGLAW
CHARLESTON C. K. WANG
NAZLY MAMEDOVA
WANGLA
W
CHARLESTON C. K. WANG
NAZLY MAMEDOVA
WANGLAW
To read
"Hezekiah's
Tunnel
under the
City of David,"
click
here.
Mr. Nifadev applied for permanent resident status in March, 2017.
Charleston C K Wang Speedo
INFOCUS:
CHEMICAL
WEAPONS & THE
HUMANITARIAN CRISIS
IN SYRIA
Click on Photo
Charleston C K Wang Speedo
Working the Tan Lines
on the bank of the Dead Sea
the Lowest Body of Water on Earth
more than 1300 feet below Sea Level
April 2010.
Somewhere near lie biblical Sodom & Gomorrah.
Working the Tan Lines by the
Aegean of the Mediterranen
Beyond in the mist rises
fabled Patmos, May 2012
BE THE CHANGE:
CIVIL RIGHTS &
IMMIGRATION REFORM
IN 2013

Robert Harris & Charleston C. K. Wang
To view
"Ephesus
of St. Paul
and
St. John"
click
here.
A REAL UZBEK DYNASTY
Pursuant to the Sixth Circuit opinion, the BIA on January 5, 2015, ordered the Immigration Court to grant asylum to Mr. Nifadev.
To read the BIA order, please
click here.

Bill Bell and Charleston C. K. Wang
A WIN IN THE U.S.  SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. On August 18, 2014 in Nifadev v. Holder, (Case No. 13-3704/4222
6th Cir. 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that Mikheil B. Nifadev has proven his claim that he
had suffered persecution by reason of his Russian ethnicity at the hands of the security and regular police of Uzbekistan.   The
Court vacated the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) in Washington, D.C. which had denied Mr. Nifadev asylum,
and the Court remanded the case with additional instructions to the United States Attorney General, including that the BIA should
determine whether the BIA should also reconsider its denial of Nifadev’s application for withholding of removal and protection
under Convention Against Torture (abbreviated CAT for Convention Against Torture And Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment of the United Nations) in light of the opinion of the Court.  The Sixth Circuit opinion essentially and
explicitly held that
"[b]ecause the IJ [Immigration Judge] appears to have erred in her determination that Nifadev did not suffer
past persecution and because the IJ clearly misinterpreted Nifadev’s credible testimony regarding the ethnic animus of the
Uzbekistan security officials, we find that Nifadev has made out a credible case of being a refugee under the definitions of
8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(A)."
 [Emphasis added].   The United States Immigration Court in Cleveland, Ohio, had initially
found Mr.  Nifadev and his witnesses to be credible but declined to grant asylum because it erroneously determined that
Mr. Nifadev had NOT suffered persecution.   Shown in photograph on the right is Mr. Mikheil B. Nifadev with Charleston
C. K. Wang, Esq.  who represented Mr. Nifadev during trial and both appeals. To read complete opinion, please
click here.
A WIN IN THE U.S.  SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. On August 18, 2014 in Nifadev v. Holder, (Case No. 13-3704/4222
6th Cir. 2014), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that Mikheil B. Nifadev has proven his claim that he
had suffered persecution by reason of his Russian ethnicity at the hands of the security and regular police of Uzbekistan.   The
Court vacated the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) in Washington, D.C. which had denied Mr. Nifadev asylum,
and the Court remanded the case with additional instructions to the United States Attorney General, including that the BIA should
determine whether the BIA should also reconsider its denial of Nifadev’s application for withholding of removal and protection
under Convention Against Torture (abbreviated CAT for Convention Against Torture And Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment of the United Nations) in light of the opinion of the Court.  The Sixth Circuit opinion essentially and
explicitly held that
"[b]ecause the IJ [Immigration Judge] appears to have erred in her determination that Nifadev did not suffer
past persecution and because the IJ clearly misinterpreted Nifadev’s credible testimony regarding the ethnic animus of the
Uzbekistan security officials, we find that Nifadev has made out a credible case of being a refugee under the definitions of
8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(1)(A)."
 [Emphasis added].   The United States Immigration Court in Cleveland, Ohio, had initially
found Mr.  Nifadev and his witnesses to be credible but declined to grant asylum because it erroneously determined that
Mr. Nifadev had NOT suffered persecution.   Shown in photograph on the right is Mr. Mikheil B. Nifadev with Charleston
C. K. Wang, Esq.  who represented Mr. Nifadev during trial and both appeals. To read complete opinion, please
click here.

Bill Bell and Charleston C. K. Wang
Pursuant to the Sixth Circuit opinion, the BIA on January 5, 2015, ordered the Immigration Court to grant asylum to Mr. Nifadev.
To read the BIA order, please
click here.
To view
"Ephesus
of St. Paul
and
St. John"
click
here.

Robert Harris & Charleston C. K. Wang
Working the Tan Lines by the
Aegean of the Mediterranen
Beyond in the mist rises
fabled Patmos, May 2012
Charleston C K Wang Speedo
Charleston C K Wang Speedo
Mr. Nifadev applied for permanent resident status in March, 2017.
THE FACES OF TURKEY
CHARLESTON C. K. WANG
NAZLY MAMEDOVA
WANGLAW
CHARLESTON C. K. WANG
NAZLY MAMEDOVA
WANGLA
W
PLEASE CLIICK ON PHOTO TO SEE
COMPLETE PHOTONEWS SPECIAL
ON "THE FACES OF TURKEY."
CHARLESTON C. K. WANG
NAZLY MAMEDOVA
WANGLAW
LET'S PLAY! >
To read
"Hezekiah's
Tunnel
under the
City of David,"
click
here.
Photocredit:  Mary Joan Reutter
To read
"A Reflection
of Jerusalem
and the New
Jerusalem
from the Ground,"  
click
here.
To view
Group
photos of
Cincinnati
Pilgrims in
Jerusalem
click
here.
To view
"Into  the
Heat of
the Hebron
Cauldon,"
\click
here.
To view
"Visitng the
Dome of the
Rock"
click
here.
To view
"The Church
of St. Peter
in Gallicantu"
click
here.
To view
"In The
Upper
Room"
click \
here.
To view
"Herodion:
A Fortress
During the
Gospels,"
click
here.

To read
"In Search
of Lazarus,"
click
here.
To read"The
Wilderness
of Abraham,
Jesus &
Israel-
Palestine,"
click
here.
To view
"The Call for
Simon Peter,
Fisherman,"
click
here.
To read
"Descending
to the Dead Sea
and Ascending
to Qumran,"  
click
here.
To view
"Caesarea
Maritima as
Known to
Saint Paul,"
click
here.
To view
"Medita-
ting Medi-
terra-nean,"
click
here.
To read "Jury
for Jericho,"  
click
here.
To view
"Wrath
of
Paul,"
click
here.
To view
"The
Empty
Tombs,"
click
here.
THE WRATH OF PAUL
Click here or on photo to see WANGNEWS Special
MEDITATING MEDITERRANEAN
Click here or on photo to see WANGNEWS Special
To view
"The Holy
Isle of
Patmos"
click
here.
To view
"Sufis
Rumi
Konya,"
click
here.
To view
"Sufis
Rumi
Konya,"
click
here.
To view
"The Holy
Isle of
Patmos"
click
here.
THE WRATH OF PAUL
Click here or on photo to see WANGNEWS Special
To view
"Wrath
of
Paul,"
click
here.
To view "Two
Very Different
Houses" click

here.


TO RETURN TO FIRST PAGE NEWS, CLICK HERE

CLICK TO GO TO
>PAGE 1>  >PAGE 2>   >PAGE 3> >PAGE 4>  >PAGE 5> >PAGE 6>  
>PAGE 7> >PAGE 8>  >PAGE 9> >PAGE10> >PAGE11>
>PAGE 12> >PAGE 13>  >PAGE 14> >PAGE 15> >PAGE 16>

Photocredit for this page:  Charleston C. K. Wang
To view
"The
Empty
Tombs,"
click
here.
To view
"In The
Upper
Room"
click \
here.
To read "Jury
for Jericho,"  
click
here.
To view
"The Church
of St. Peter
in Gallicantu"
click
here.
To view "In
Search of the
Messianic
Secret -
Caesarea
Phillipi,"
click
here.
To read
"Hezekiah's
Tunnel
under the
City of David,"
click
here.
To read"The
Wilderness
of Abraham,
Jesus &
Israel-
Palestine,"
click
here.

V
More Photonews to come.
Visit www.wangnews.net again and soon!
V
V
To view
"Herodion:
A Fortress
During the
Gospels,"
click
here.
To view
"Pilgrimage to
Bethlehem,
Birthplace
of Jesus,
click
here.

Bill Bell and Charleston C. K. Wang
To view "The
Garden of
Gethsemane and
Church of All
Nations," click

here.

Robert Harris & Charleston C. K. Wang
To view
"Into  the
Heat of
the Hebron
Cauldon,"
\click
here.
To read
"A Reflection
of Jerusalem
and the New
Jerusalem
from the Ground,"  
click
here.

Bill Bell and Charleston C. K. Wang
Mary Ellen O'Connell
INFOCUS:
UNIVERSAL
EDUCATION
IN THE
WORLD -
Example of
Malala
Yousafzai
Click on Photo
Working the Tan Lines by the
Aegean of the Mediterranen
Beyond in the mist rises
fabled Patmos, May 2012
Charleston C K Wang Speedo
To view
"Istanbul"
click
here.
CHARLESTON C. K. WANG
NAZLY MAMEDOVA
WANGLAW
CHARLESTON C. K. WANG
NAZLY MAMEDOVA
WANGLA
W
CHARLESTON C. K. WANG
NAZLY MAMEDOVA
WANGLAW

Book Review: HENRY KISSINGER: ON CHINA
First published in 2011 by The Penguin Press, a member of Penguin Group (USA) Inc.

DOES HENRY REALLY UNDERSTAND CHINESE?

In a few days, it will be June 4 and the 24th Anniversary of Tienanmen.  In a week, the new Chinese President Xi Jinping will meet with President Barack Obama for
the first time in California to discuss security issues.  
This is also the year of the 90th birthday of Henry Alfred Kissinger.    It is a propitious time to review the Nobel
Peace Prize Laureate's latest book,  "ON CHINA."   Dr. Henry Kissinger is a teacher, as well as, a practitioner extraordinaire of Realpolitik - in the footsteps of
Machiavelli, Richelieu, Bismark, and his contemporary, President Richard M. Nixon.   

In his book, Dr. Kissinger turns his attention from Europe and gazes further eastward towards China. Given global realities, he could have focused directly on China by
going westward, since he writes from the American national interest.   The United States of America entered the world stage in the name of democracy by exerting
power across the Atlantic Ocean but presently, prominence must also be exerted across the Pacific.  This geopolitical reality is almost unique to the United States and
may be readily inferred from the book.

It is through his analysis of the balance of power in Europe that Dr.  Kissinger made his mark as a scholar, but he is indebted to China for his renown as a statesman.  
But does Henry really understand Chinese?  Let us explore this further.

Dr.  Kissinger opens his book by calling China a "Singularity," noting that China is the only ancient civilization that does not have a founding myth, a story of how a
people began.   Reading the first few pages, one is beguiled into thinking that Dr. Kissinger's interest in writing about China is sublimely philosophical, even
theological.   This is furthest from the truth because it quickly becomes obvious that his interest firmly lies in the practical aspects of a cooperative Sino-American
relationship, notwithstanding the deep cultural and ideological divides that bedevil the liaison.

Quickly, Kissinger launches into an analysis of the ancient Chinese game of
wei qi (better known in the West as "go") and the perceptive reader can grasp that he also
has on his mind the American game of "containment" (à la George Kennan).   On matters of Chinese antiquity, Kissinger has the audacity to place Sun Tzu on an equal
plane with Confucius, this being sure to raise some Chinese eyebrows.   I count him as quoting Sun Tzu on War more often than Confucius on Ethics (whom he
merely mentions), perhaps revealing that Kissinger knows that Sino-American relations have been strained by war, such as the Vietnam and Korean Wars (where US
troops engaged Chinese).   

This takes us to the purpose of Dr. Kissinger's book - how to continue mutually beneficial and peaceful relations between two superpowers.  Dr. Kissinger waxes
nostalgic about Triangular Diplomacy (USA-USSR-China) and his pivotal but then secret role in setting up the Nixon-Mao meeting in China in 1972 and the Shanghai
Communiqué.  He shares, somewhat but not quite all pedagogically, key details of his various intimate conversations with Chinese leaders such as Chairman Mao,
Zhou Enlai, Deng Xiaopeng (dubbed "The Indestructible Deng"), Jiang Zemin, and Hu Jintao. These colorful dialogues which transpired over many decades, span  
humorously earthy quips (e.g. "touching the tiger's buttocks"), fearsome saber-rattling, and other calculated tantrums (e.g. Mao's diatribes on his lack of fear of atomic
weapons when China still was without the Bomb) - all of which promise to be a good hearty read.   Kissinger in his polished fashion is gentle, even generous in
describing friend and foe, domestic or foreign; when necessary he resorts to adjectives such as "prolix" and "mordant."

None can write a book on modern China without coming to grips with the 1989 Tiananmen Massacre.  Dr. Kissinger's account has drawn criticism from many
quarters,   The penchant of the former National Security Advisor and Secretary of State for secrecy is legendary.  His perceived disdain for imposing democracy and
the knee-jerk advancement of human rights (such as the little triangle between China-Vietnam-Khmer Rouge) have also earned him many critics.  

The New York Times has noted that "the severest test of the quasi alliance, of course, was the brutal suppression of democratic strivings in Tiananmen Square in
1989," and "that violent crackdown also tested Kissinger’s tolerance for the assertion of American values in foreign relations."  In his defense, it must be said that
Kissinger, at all times, gives priority to the perpetuation of cooperation between China and the USA.  His highest values, perhaps as a result of infantry combat
experience during the Allied advance on Berlin and subsequent civilian work for nuclear arms control during the Cold War, are found ultimately in the effort to avoid
tensions that may precipitate war.   

Kissinger must be somberly read in all the chapters for anyone to come to any conclusion on this complex balancing of values, but perhaps this quote from the book
can get the inquiry started:  “The best outcome in the American debate would be to combine the two approaches: for the idealists to recognize that principles need to be
implemented over time and hence must be occasionally adjusted to circumstance; and for the ‘realists’ to accept that values have their own reality and must be built
into operational policies.”

Dr. Kissinger closes his tome with that well worn Question, "Does History Repeat Itself?"  Well versed in the peace protocols attempted at Westphalia onwards to
Yalta (-Potsdam), he seeks to extend the lessons of 20th century Europe, including a presentation of the Eyre Crowe Memorandum on pre-World War I Germany to
interactions with China in the 21st.  China now as the newest superpower will more and more bring her understanding of "Bringing Peace Under Heaven" (平天下 -
ping tian xia) to bear on affairs of the world.   So, we come full circle to that first question - does Henry really understand Chinese?  

This question has fascinated me for a while.  Even after reading "On China" a few times over, it is not very apparent or clear that Henry does understand Chinese.  All
the salient conversations he recounts in the book were conducted through English-Chinese interpreters.  He never incorporated Chinese script in his book.  In the
Preface, he acknowledged that the lawyer Schuyler Schouten assisted with translations of Chinese documents.  Nonetheless, it will not surprise me that over the years
Dr. Kissinger indeed has mastered a working command of a difficult language, but in the best traditions of the land of Crouching Tigers and Hidden Dragons, he has,
perhaps out of  modesty, or more likely, pragmatism, never professed his competence.
1


1
Unlike President Jiang Zemin, who according to Kissinger, "with non-Chinese visitors, ...
regularly incorporated English or Russian or even Romanian expressions into his presentations
to emphasize a point  - shifting without warning between a rich sense of Chinese classical
idioms and such American colloquialisms as 'it takes two to tango.'"
To read
"Confession of a
Gentile in
Jerusalem:  The
Paradox of the Five
Sheklim Blessing,"  
click
here.
To read "Yad
Vashem, A
Monument &
Name to
Remember"  click

here
.
To read "The
Road to
Emmaus,"  
click
here.
Trihealth Pavilion  2015
SWIM THE COAST T-Shirt
Awarded Distance Swim
THIRTY FIVE (35) MILES
March 2015

Bill Bell and Charleston C. K. Wang
To view
"Hagia
Sophia"
click
here.
To view
"Faces
of
Turkey"
click
here.










THE ASIAN AMERICAN HOUR has gotten bigger - we are now on the air weekly on public radio
WAIF-CINCINNATI 88.3 FM and our broadcast time has moved to prime-time  
THE ASIAN AMERICAN
HOUR
CONTINUES 20 YEARS ON THE AIR WITH WAIF 88.3 FM - Date of First Broadcast: 6/7/2001
THE ASIAN AMERICAN HOUR will continue to feature talk, and music, and other good things with a discernable slant
towards Asian American affairs, immigration, and many other issues of interest to our community-at-large.
 
THE ASIAN AMERICAN HOUR is produced and hosted by Charleston Wang, Esq. with John G. O'Neill.
as co-host, together with our distinguished guests.

So, tune in to
THE ASIAN AMERICAN HOUR on WAIF-CINCINNATI 88.3 FM. every Monday 5-6 PM. Get the latest on
the Asian American community in Cincinnati, the fast growing & mobile community in the Tri-state.   

After listening to the
THE ASIAN AMERICAN HOUR, e-mail us direct feedback and thoughts by clicking here.  If you
or a friend wish to be a guest on
THE  ASIAN AMERICAN HOUR,  please let us know.  Tune in to THE ASIAN
AMERICAN  HOUR
every Monday 5 - 6 PM on WAIF 88.3 FM Cincinnati on the air, or listen
Via internet streaming audio from anywhere in the world by clicking here.
Charleston C. K. Wang, Producer & Host
John G. O'Neill, Co-Host
RECALLING THE CINCINNATI HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION - WE NEED IT MORE THAN EVER!
Click on Photo for more photonews
THIS IS A 2007 PHOTO
May 2022  Extra
For April 2022 Extra  Click Here
To view
"Istanbul"
click
here.
WHO LOST CHINA, WHO LOST VIETNAM, AND WHO LOST AFGHANISTAN?














Towards the end of  this August, 2021, the world witnessed the fall of Kabul, Afghanistan to the Taliban, and the withdrawal of the last U.S. and NATO troops along with the
unceremonious closing of the U. S. Embassy in the beleaguered city. (As a side-note one can ask what was NATO - North Atlantic Treaty Organization - a military organization pledged to
defend Western Europe against first Soviet communism and then Russian imperialism, doing in a land of Islam).  After 20 long years of investing treasure and lives in that landlocked
country of forbidding mountains and extremes in winter to summer climate, the hue and cry of “WHO LOST AFGHANISTAN?” may be expected to be raised against President Joe Biden
as a matter of political
de rigueur.   While the jury is still out regarding the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, I will offer, once again into the fray dear friends, my simplistic opinion –
the USA had for two decades poured our resources to create a phantom army which evaporated at our present moment in history.

Sun Tzu once remarked that most observers can see the tactics of battles being lost or won but very few can see the strategy that ensures the final outcome of War.  Did the USA
lose in China, Vietnam, and now Afghanistan?  A
cliché is to counter with the question “IS CHINA, VIETNAM, AND AFGHANISTAN FOR AMERICA TO LOSE?”   The underlying
premise in this classical and quite magnificent rebuttal is that “AMERICA NEVER OWNED CHINA, WE NEVER OWNED CHINA, VIETNAM, AND AFGHANISTAN!”  But this
tête-à-tête is between jaded warhorses.

I would like to close by revisiting with a discussion of the “Fallacy of the Domino Theory.”  This geopolitical hypothesis subscribed by some pundits during 1950s and into the 1980s'
posits that if one country in a region came under the domination of communism,  the adjoining countries would also soon fall like toppling dominoes.  

In modern context, the first and biggest domino to fall was China and the Dominoed fear of all Asia succumbing to the hegemony of Chinese communism was the prime reason for the
USA to take over the game from the French in Vietnam after their route at Dien Bien Phu.  Indeed, after the fall of Saigon in 1975 to communist Hanoi, the Khmer Rouge (Red Khmer)
began their takeover of Cambodia.  Pol Pot seized Phnom Penh and then started a genocide against his own people, driving out and systematically killing the educated city dwellers
of that small country.  

The senseless brutality of the Khmer Rouge proved too much even for battle hardened Hanoi.   In 1978, Hanoi invaded and drove their communist cousins from power and for a while
it appeared that Hanoi had the wherewithal also to conquer Laos and then Thailand, a feat which would vindicate the Domino Theorists.  However, the Domino Theory itself fell flat
in the dust when in 1979, the People’s Republic of China turned on their communist cousins by invading Vietnam.  History records that the Vietnamese veterans stopped the drive of
unseasoned Chinese troops towards Hanoi.  After just one month of fighting Deng Xiaoping's War at great cost, Beijing withdrew.  Both countries then claimed victory.  Before we
leave behind 1979, I will remind you that it was on Christmas Eve of 1979 when the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, precipitating nearly 10 years of brutal guerilla warfare.

But Hanoi had taken note of China’s signal and restrained themselves -  Laos and Thailand were left unmolested, notwithstanding sporadic border skirmishes aimed at refugee
camps.  After tens years of “peace-keeping” or perhaps even “nation-building” in Cambodia, Hanoi officially withdrew its troops and the Kingdom of Kampuchea was restored.
A remarkable unintended consequence of the little triangle conflict between China-Vietnam-Cambodia was the fall and destruction of the “Domino Theory.”  

Of greater world stage import was the revealing of fissure and actual armed conflict between the two great communist countries of China and the now defunct USSR.  More astute
U. S. practitioners of great triangle geopolitics, namely President Richard Nixon and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, then first normalized and next re-opened full diplomatic
relations with China.  The Chinese counterpart and master of this game of
wei qi was Premier Zhou Enlai (formerly spelled Chou En-lai), quite likely China's greatest statesman.   This
grand rapprochement toppled the Soviet Union in 1991.   The fall of the Berlin wall symbolized the end of the Cold War which started in 1945 and greatly lessened the threat of
global nuclear war.  For aforesaid reasons, and in my humble opinion, we must never ask aloud today “WHO LOST CHINA, WHO LOST VIETNAM, AND WHO LOST AFGHANISTAN!”

Charleston C. K. Wang, September 2, 2021.
I largely agree with your assessment.  The U. S. mis-read the world situation in China, Vietnam, Iraq, Granada, Afghanistan, and many other examples.  Our inability to see other than
"good guys and bad guys" has cost us trillions of dollars and untold lives spent doing nothing but fighting wars that have led to, arguably, nothing constructive.  Soft power may have
been our most important "weapon" against forces that seek to destroy democracy, but we don't seem to generally employ them well.  The Marshall Plan and the idea of constructive
engagement would seem to be a preferential response to the many global situations we find ourselves in where we attempt to define  "good guys and bad guys".  A more nuanced
and discerning foreign policy might result in a more thoughtful and constructive way to approach global peace.  At least this is my humble opinion.  

JT.  
John T. Spence, PhD, AICP, Professor, Political Science, Thomas More University.  Thanks for sharing.   September 4, 2021.
Caveat:  This Response is the viewpoint of the reader only and does not reflect that of Thomas More University on any issue discussed.  
Violence and war do not show strength of a nation, still less engenders respect and/or earn hearts and mind with people.  If that is the case, why do USA repeatedly use violence and
war as a foreign service tool, with little consideration of the pain and suffering, destruction and killing in other countries and people!?
KC Wong,, Ph.D, J.D.  Professor Emeritus, Xavier University, Cincinnati, Ohio, September 7, 2021.
Author's Post Script:  I would like to defer to Sun Tzu once again.  Over 2500 years ago, the ancient Master in the Art of War 孫子兵法 once said:
Chapter 2 - What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged fighting.  There is no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare.  故兵貴勝,不貴久。兵久而國利者,未之有也。
Chapter 3 -  For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the pinnacle of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the pinnacle of skill. 是故百戰百勝,非善之善者
也;不戰而屈人之兵,善之善者也.  C K September 11, 2021.
Buy your MEIER'S Sparkling
Juices on-line by clicking here.

In 1949, the United States of America was compelled to withdraw from China Ambassador John Leighton Stuart, a man TIME magazine
had called "perhaps the most respected American in China.”  Mao Zedong (then referred to as Mao Tse-tung) had completed the
armed takeover of that vast country and the USA was in no mood to continue diplomatic relations with the Chinese communists.  Back
home in Washington, D.C. the hue and cry of “WHO LOST CHINA?” soon increased to hurricane force.  Senator Joe McCarhy presided
over a terror against the U. S. State Department and other officials suspected of being soft on communism.  McCarthyism finally spent
itself after that Senator began to look for scapegoats inside the U. S. Army.  General Dwight Eisenhower, now the first Republican
president in 20 years, publicly criticized the Senator’s over-reach in his soft-spoken yet powerful style.

In retrospect, that question “WHO LOST CHINA?” lingers.  In my opinion, Mao won China because the USA backed the regime of Chiang
Kai-shek, who took massive amounts of U. S. dollars and created phantom armies which either did not exist or turned themselves and
their equipment at the critical moment to the Eighth Route Army.  It was not until 1979 when Leonard Woodcock presented diplomatic
credentials as ambassador once again to the People’s Republic of China.

In 1975, disaster struck in Saigon, South Vietnam, when North Vietnamese regulars drove their Russian vintage tanks into the
presidential palace and U. S. Ambassador Graham Anderson Martin was obliged to vacate in haste.   In the aftermath of that
humiliating debacle, the hue and cry over “WHO LOST VIETNAM?” was a weak
doppelgänger to the storm raised by McCarthy.   
A state of diplomatic void existed until 1997 when Pete Petersen returned to Hanoi, Socialist Republic of Vietnam as U. S.
Ambassador.   To this day, the question of “WHO LOST VIETNAM?” lingers.  My simplistic opinion is that South Vietnam was overrun
by the North because after the withdrawal of U. S. troops in 1973, the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (shortened to ARVN) had
become,
from internal corruption, another phantom force .  Soon enough, that army threw down their rifles, doffed their uniforms,
and turned over the heavier equipment to their adversaries.
For Upcoming Sunday
Seminars on Current
Issues at Christ Church
Cathedral in the City of
Cincinnati
click here.
Oil Painting by Elizabeth Thompson, Lady Butler,
"REMNANTS OF AN ARMY"
showing Assistant British Army Surgeon William
Brydon arriving at Jellalabad after surviving the
disastrous retreat from Kabul in 1842.
GOT NEWS?  
GOT
OPINION?
Send your information,
photographs, or
comments to
WANGNEWS for
consideration to be
published in
WANG
NEWS SERVICE.

To send, use this
email address:

news@wangnews.net

Very good argument. Let’s go even further. Why has US been in the state of perpetual war? Because, I think, it has the power and money to spend with whatever excuse it can come up
with such as anticommunism or antiterrorism. Who makes money over the dead bodies of soldiers and civilians? War industry. They made billions at tax payers’ money and soldiers’
lives and limbs. If peace prevails, they can’t pay good money and dividends to their executives and stockholders.. What a sad economy and we call it patriotism.  Anonymous.  9/3/2021.
Reach out to the
decision-makers, opinion-
agents of Greater
Cincinnati and the World.

ADVERTISE with
WANG NEWS SERVICE.

For terms and conditions,
you are invited to inquire
by email:

advertise@wangnews.net
[ Yahoo! ] options
GOT RICE?
WANGLAW
Attorneys & Counselors at Law
SEARCH WANGNEWS
THE ASIAN AMERICAN HOUR
on WAIF 88.3 FM Cincinnati
IS NOW A WEEKLY PRIME-TIME SHOW
EVERY MONDAY EVENING  5 - 6 P.M.
Informing the People of Cincinnati (and Beyond) since 6/7/2001.
Listen via internet streaming audio by clicking here,

CONTACT US AT asianamericanhour@wangnews.net
To read old "First Page News," click here
WANGNEWS
OKSANA ZHURAVSKA
Paralegal WANGLAW
PROTESTS PUTIN'S INVASION OF UKRAINE,
Cincinnati City Hall, 02/28/2022
You need Java to see this applet.
Current U. S. Eastern Time:
CLICK HERE TO SEE
INDEX OF OP-EDS
Those who would give up
Essential Liberty to purchase
a little Temporary Safety,
deserve neither Liberty nor
Safety  - Benjamin Franklin
(1759).
SEARCH WANGNEWS
EVERY
MONDAY EVENING
5 - 6 P.M.
EVERY
MONDAY EVENING
5 - 6 P.M.
REDISCOVERING DISNEY
To send WANGNEWS Feedback, please click here
STAND WITH UKRAINE
John G. O'Neill
Charleston C. K. Wang, Esq.
KEEP CALM BREATHE ON!
Be Safe: Get Vaccinated! Get Boostered!
Wear A Mask!
TURKISH TCG DENIZKUSU P321 PATROLLING BOSPHORUS-DARDANELLES PASSAGE
The passage of ships, civilian and military, between the Black Sea and the larger Mediterranean is addressed by the Montreux Convention of 1936 (superseding the Treaty of Lausanne of 1923).  Under
this international document, lawful control of maritime passage through the Bosphorus-Marmara-Dardanelles was given to Turkey.  A key peacekeeping (or "de-escalation") provision empowers Turkey to
close the Turkish Straits to most military traffic in times of war.  In  light of the war of aggression initiated by Russia against Ukraine beginning on 2/24/2022, Turkey on 2/27, recognized the invasion as a
war in violation of international law.  Citing Montreux, Turkey announced that it will exercise its power to forbid transit of all military vessels with the legal exception of ships with pre-registration to a
Black Sea port seeking passage to return to its home port including the naval base around Sevastopol in the Crimea.  Montreux also sets limits on number and tonnage of warships of non-Black Sea
countries  (Romania, Bulgaria, Georgia, Russia and Ukraine) and on the duration of the presence of such "foreign" ships.  On 3/2/2022, Russia withdrew its request for passage of 4 navy ships - 2 destroyers,
1 frigate, and 1 intelligence vessel - through Turkish waters into the Black Sea. Charleston C. K. Wang, Esq. - 03/26/2022.
Photo Courtesy of Charleston C.K. Wang, Esq. - May 2012
Historical note: TCG Denizkusu P321 was a fast patrol craft of Turkey which saw
service from 1967-2016.  With a complement of 39, she was capable of 40 knots and
was armed  with Breda 40 mm/70 Bofors and various torpedoes.
An Independent Source of News & Views

2022

THE LONG PEACE
(Pax Americana):

Igitur qui desiderat pacem,
praeparet bellum.

(Si vis pacem, para bellum).
REVEREND
DAMON LYNCH III
SPEAKS AT
EQUASION
MEETING ON
BECOMING
JOSHUA-
The Path to
Economic
Freedom
APRIL 21, 2022
Click on photo
for view more
AJC CINCINNATI 29TH ANNUAL
COMMUNITY INTERGROUP SEDER
CELEBRATING PASSOVER
April 6, 2022
The 'Wise," "Wicked," "Simple," and "Naive" Child
Photo by Charleston C K Wang, Esq.
Click on Photo to see All Photos

       CAN AMERICA APPRECIATE
  XI JINPING’S SENSE OF HUMOR?



On April 11, 2022, the world woke up to news that China has delivered by Y-20 military air transports a missile system to Serbia.   For example, the Hindustan Times reported specifics:
"China delivered the FK-3, the export version of the Chinese HQ-22 surface-to-air missile system."  My initial reaction is “Oh No! What is China Doing Now?”

In the context of the bloody Ukraine-Russia war, one can rush to imagine an escalation of that conflict by China on behalf of Russia.  But deeper analysis and cooler review from a
longer time-frame (but not that long actually) can uncover a subtle sense of humor in world affairs on the part of Xi Jinping.

First, from the geopolitical point-of-view, Serbia is a post-cold war nation that emerged from the former Yugoslavia after the end of the Yugoslav Wars (1991-2001 - sometimes misnamed
the Balkan Wars), then touted as Europe’s deadliest conflict after the Second World War.  During the Soviet era, Yugoslavia under Marshal Josip Broz Tito was a nominal ally of Moscow
with its independent thinking.   Today. Serbia retains friendly relations with the Russian Federation although she is much beguiled by the siren call of the European Union.  Again, in the
context of the war in Ukraine, Serbia is located a distance away, being buffered by Romania.

Second from the military point-of-view, why does Belgrade need surface-to-air missiles from China?   Today, with Russia pre-occupied with the merciless bombing of Ukraine, whose air
force is going to bomb Serbia?  After all, while tempted to integrate into the economy of western Europe, Serbia being a Slavic nation has a historical defense affinity with Moscow.  
Then can it be NATO who will bomb Serbia?  NATO is so very reserved in military action and will not deploy troops into Ukraine although Putin continues to commit war crimes there.

The alternate question that may give light with answer is “Why is China sending the FK-3 truck mobile, medium range missiles to Serbia?”  That answer that came to me and which
I will share with you forthwith is that Xi Jinpeng has a sense of humor, dark and somber as it is, but nevertheless a subtle Chinese sense of humor.

Xi Jinping wants to remind the world that the country that actually bombed Belgrade from the air after the Second World War was none other than the United States of America (with NATO
tagging along).  On May 7, 1999, during Operation Allied Force, five U.S. Joint Direct Attack Munition guided bombs launched from U.S. Air Force B-2 Spirit bombers hit the Embassy of the
People's Republic of China in Belgrade.  Three Chinese journalists—Shao Yunhuan of
Xinhua, and Xu Xinghu and his wife Zhu Ying of the Guangming Daily—were killed in the attack.
Another 20 Chinese citizens were injured, 5 seriously.

Innuendo and excuses were that the site was engaged in military communications or logistics particularly in support of Serbian forces fighting at that time against Kosovo.  Any
suggestion of a deliberate targeting of the embassy was, of course, denied and the attack was eventually resolved as a mistake in target selection and in settlement the USA paid
compensation to the Chinese families and to China for the destruction of property.  I am sure now more than 20 years later, most Americans have forgotten about the bombing of the
Chinese Embassy and those of us who remember would prefer to forget, but for the Chinese and Serbians it may be a totally different experience to be remembered.

To conclude, it is my fervent hope that Xi Jinping keeps his sense of humor, if not a deep command of irony that prompted China to rush ground-to-air missiles to Serbia this week.  
At best it is a very incisive current maneuver to severely embarrass the United States using not too ancient history.  And I hope that this is the only reason and Xi sees no more reason to
aggravate or escalate war into Serbia or any other country beyond the on-going death and destruction being inflicted by Russia against Ukraine. And have not the various peoples of the
Balkans suffered enough horrors of war including genocide in the last 30 years?

An Opinion by Charleston C. K. Wang.  April 12, updated April 14, 2022.
WAIF 88.3 FM STANDS WITH UKRAINE
LUDMILA POWLOWSKA AT CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL APRIL 1 - MAY 22, 2022
Click on Photo
EASTER SUNDAY AT CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDAL
IN THE CITY OF CINCINNATI - APRIL 17, 2022

Ludmilla Polusmiak, Anna & Dmitri Shelest, Oksana Zhuravska, Paralegal, Charleston C. K. Wang, Esq. WANGLAW
Ukraine Benefits Concert Given by Anna & Dmitri Shelest
(NKU 2005, 2005, 2008) at Greaves Concert Hall, Northern Kentucky University, April 22, 2022
LUDMILA POWLOWSKA AT CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL APRIL 1 - MAY 22, 2022 - Click on Photos
Blessed Are the Children for
They shall Inherit the Earth

UKRAINE FOOD FESTIVAL
Fleming Road United Church of Christ
April 24, 2022

Click on Photo to see more
Photo courtesy of Charleston C. K. Wang, Esq.
UKRAINE FOOD FESTIVAL
Fleming Road United Church of Christ
April 24, 2022

Click on Photo to see more
USCIS NOW PROCESSING QUICKLY TEMPORARY PROTECTION STATUS (TPS) AND
EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION DOCUMENTS (EADs) FOR PEOPLE FROM UKRAINE WHO
HAVE BEEN CONTINOUSLY PRESENT IN USA SINCE APRIL 11, 2022
Istanbul Bosphorus Bridge peaceful at night in 2012
Photocredit: Charleston C. K. Wang, Esq.
MAKAN
MINUM
SEDAP DAN
KENYANG
MALAYSIA
MASARAP
NA
PAGKAIN
MABUHAY
FILIPINO!
こんにちは
良い食
ПРИВІТ
ASIAN FOOD FEST, COURT STREET PLAZA, CINCINNATI, OHIO USA - MAY 7-8, 2022
ASIAN FOOD FEST, COURT STREET PLAZA, CINCINNATI, OHIO USA - MAY 7-8, 2022
ПРИВЕТ
안녕하세요
CINCINNATI
CHEFS
HOST
"PIEROGI
FOR PEACE"
OTR StillHouse
Cincinnati
May 9, 2022
GOODBYE JAIPAL SINGH, WE SHALL MISS YOU
Photo courtesy of Oksana Zhuravkska